Showing posts with label choosing genre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label choosing genre. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Genre Monogamy



Part-time Whore Jane Kindred is here for one final week before Allison returns. 

And this week, I’m going to be the killjoy. I believe in genres. Which is not to say that I think they can’t be crossed, mixed, mashed, twisted, and turned on their heads—but I still respect them as classifications with innate value. Among other things, they’re for readers to know what they’re getting. Most romance readers don’t want to read 1,000-page sword and sorcery fantasies. And the reverse is also usually true. As a reader, you learn to trust a certain voice, to look for more by an author whose voice you’ve come to love, and if that voice suddenly changes, it can feel like a betrayal.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I think blending genres or writing in related genres or subgenres is great. Where I have issues is when writers try to write all over the map. I’m sure there are some who can do it well, but I see a lot of unestablished writers who don’t seem to be developing a strong voice in one genre or another. Sometimes it looks like throwing everything at the wall to see what will stick. It also feels a lot like writing only for the money. It’s one thing to write for money, hence this blog’s name, but writing only for money just leaves me cold. Writing is something I will always do for love first, with the hope that one day, the money will come along as a bonus.

Years ago, when I was taking photography in college, I remember one particular assignment midway through the semester where I was shocked to find I’d gotten a D. I’d started the semester with As and Bs, but my grades with each assignment had been dropping just a bit lower, until this one kicked me in the gut. I thought I was doing something interesting, making sure all of my photos were different, exploring different techniques, being adventurous. My instructor asked me what was interesting about my photos and I had to admit as I stared at them on the table in front of him, I didn’t have an answer. I think I said something like, “well, they’re diverse.” He replied that I needed to learn how to do one thing well before I tried doing everything. He also explained that it was the hallmark of a mature artist to develop a recognizable style. At 20, that concept hadn’t even occurred to me until he said it to me that day and I began to look around at all the artists I loved and realize why I loved them.

That lesson stuck, for good or ill. I’m still trying to get good at what I do. For the most part, I write epic fantasy with a somewhat urban/paranormal flavor. While I’ve also written erotica, I prefer when the fantasy and the erotica are in the same package. That’s what works for me as a writer. When I write erotica without fantasy, I can do it technically well, but my heart isn’t in it. I’ve also tried writing romance (with and without erotic elements) without the fantasy or paranormal, and it just falls flat. Maybe it’s just that I’m not as multi-talented as other writers, but I feel strongly that I need to love what I write. If other writers who hop genres truly love what they’re writing, then maybe it works. But for me, I find it difficult to divide my love and attention. Maybe I’m actually a monogamist after all.

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Being a Multi-Genre Writer

The conference is over and I'm heading home this morning!

Last night my wonderful Kensington editor, Peter Senftleben, took us out to dinner at the Chart House at the Golden Nugget. Agent Pam and David came along, too. It was excellent and very fun.

This week's topic of conversation in the bordello is Jumping Genres. It's a funny one for me, since I'm the one in this group who probably writes in the most genres. If we had Spice-Girl style nicknames, I would be Multi-Genre Ho.

Which doesn't have much of a ring to it, huh?

(Back when I was still pitching my first novels and trying to get a fiction-publishing deal, an agent told me my books fell in the cracks between genres. My ever-loving and supportive friends started calling me the Crack Ho.)

At any rate I have written and published in:

Creative Nonfiction
Poetry
Literary Fiction
Magical Realism
Science Fiction
Fantasy
Sword & Sorcery
Fantasy Romance
Contemporary Romance
Erotic Romance
Erotic Fantasy

I'm also noodling a great idea for a kind of suspense/thriller something or other.

I kind of haven't met a genre I didn't like - they all have their seductive qualities. Really, I'll go home with any of them, as long as they treat me right.

It's not like I did this on purpose, however. In many ways, I think my "problem" is that I don't think in terms of genre. They're all just stories to me. This is possibly because there's not many books I don't enjoy - I read widely and eclectically. In my head, this becomes the kind of "soup" that Veronica and James mentioned in their posts last week.

Now, the standard advice to new writers is to concentrate on one genre, build your author brand there, and only branch out later. If ever. There are many cautionary tales of writers who stepped out of their branded genre to do something else and got slapped by readers. (Remember when Stephen King first wrote a Literary Fiction novel?)

I could never follow this advice.

And I used to feel kind of bad about it. I think that, in some ways, publishing in several genres did slow my trajectory. I don't have a author brand clearly associated with one genre.

However, looking back on my life, I see that this is very much who I am. I am Eclectic Girl. In college, I double-majored in Comparative Religious Studies and Biology - with enough credits for a theater minor. I'm not sure there's a genre I've never read. When I take those Type A vs Type B or Right Brain vs. Left Brain tests, I always get an even score of both.

This is who I am, apparently.

And now people are telling me that my brand is clear. That my stories all do have common elements, regardless of where they're shelved. Sure, I have some readers who only read my fantasy stuff and some who only read the contemporary stuff - but that's actually very cool. Something for everyone!

The topic title is an interesting choice, because it recalls the concept of "jumping genes." Barbara McClintock won the Nobel Prize for identifying this phenomenon, where genetic elements actually move from one sequence to another, essentially mixing things up. As far as fitness and natural selection are concerned, maximum heterogeneity (a variety of genes) is FAR more beneficial than homogeneity (genes that match). Basically it means that an individual with a lot of ability to adapt - for example, be able to change food sources - is more likely to survive than and individual with a very tight niche (think panda bears that can ONLY eat certain leaves).

After all, if you only write in one genre, what happens when that genre is no longer hot? You risk extinction as an author.

In the end, I really believe that genre is a marketing construction. It shouldn't be a straightjacket.

It's all about the story.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Literary Asshattery: It's All Genre

by KAK  

Why do I write genre fiction? Simple. I lack the wherewithal to write non-fiction.

Why genre fiction? Uhm, that's kind of the only option. Believe it or not, "literary fiction" is a term used by publishers, academics, and critics. Novelists who put that noxious label on their work are dragged into a dark chasm and bitch-slapped by a horde of goblins.

Oh, KAK, "literary fiction" is deep
It's thought-provoking. It's layered. It's lyrical. It's ...  

~shriek~

You don't want to know what hunts readers who profess to read only "literary fiction." ~shudder~
 

Monday, May 7, 2012

OH WAIT, THERE WAS A FREAKING CHOICE IN THIS?

Most of you know by now that I grew up reading. I read from a wee child. Not namby pamby SEE SPOT RUN crap either. Real deal books. I was always a huge fan of comic books, voraciously reading everyone of them I could get my hands on. Stuff like this:
I mean look at that. That's freaking Conan. He would stick with me for YEARS. I never stopped loving the character. "Hither came Conan, the Cimmerian, black-haired, sullen-eyed, sword in hand, a thief, a reaver, a slayer, with gigantic melancholies and gigantic mirth, to tread the jeweled thrones of the Earth under his sandalled feet..." Robert E. Howard The Phoenix On The Sword I would follow him into the books like this one.
And even to the movies. I also read comic books like this:
That is a red-ass T-rex my friend! This is what my young mind was consuming. Sword and sorcery mayhem along with lobster-skinned T-rex's with friends!
Then we get Edgar Rice Burroughs Hollow Earth stuff. Whoa! Mind blown! There is a civilization that lives on the inside of the crust of our earth? Crazy! And Wonderful! AND THEN MY OLD FRIENDS COMIC BOOKS CAME ALONG WITH MORE SWORD AND SORCERY KICK-ASSERY INSIDE HOLLOW EARTH! OMG!
I know my youth had a harder sci-fi/fantasy edge to it than what I write today, but this is where the seeds were planted. I grew up on a steady diet of this stuff and it was awesome.