Showing posts with label POV. Show all posts
Showing posts with label POV. Show all posts

Saturday, January 17, 2015

POV Challenges From Guest Author Beth Mattthews

Veronica sez: I’ve had One of Those Weeks, with some medical issues and hence little to no energy; therefore I’ve invited author Beth Matthews to give us a guest post. 

I turned to her because she was the person who convinced me that maybe omniscient wasn’t the one and only best way in the world to be writing these days, and helped me transition to third limited. That transition was back in 2010 when I first began to write seriously and hone my craft in an attempt to become published (which happened for me in 2012, thank you, Carina Press!)  Ms. Matthews, who’d been published in multiple genres by 2010 (under a different pen name) was very persuasive and patient! And now I love third limited and use it all the time. End of meaningful discussion from yours truly…
 
In the interests of full disclosure, I will also mention that Ms. Matthews is my daughter…

So thanks for pinch hitting and take it away, Guest Word Whore!

Beth Matthews: (A lot of the foundation for my knowledge about POV came from the brilliant Joanna Bourne, please check out her Technical Topics if you haven't yet. Here's a link round up of all her blogs on POV:

Most romance novels are written in third limited POV with chapters alternating between the hero and the heroine's POVs. "Third limited POV" is essentially one step back from first person. As a reader, you aren't really in the character's head, but you still stay focused on them like you are. While you read, you only see what they see, you only know what they know, and you don't head hop in the middle of a scene to another character's thoughts.

The particular challenge as a romance writer when you're doing two alternating POVs is how to make the characters different while still showing that these people are compatible. For the romance to be credible the lovers usually have to mostly think the same way, they have to share a world view. But you still want readers to be able to tell whose POV they're in.

I've come up with a couple tricks for this myself. For instance, in my latest release LOVE'S LAST CALL the hero is an author while the heroine is a mechanical engineer. For the hero, I deliberately used larger "ten dollar" words at times, and I was more likely to use metaphors and other figurative language in chapters from his POV. For the heroine, I pruned out any "ten dollar" words and simplified the prose a little to make her sound more matter of fact, less stylized.

Another easy trick is to assign each character certain words and not let the other character use those. One might talk in longer sentences while the other has a more staccato rhythm. Dropping words. Speaking quick. Bare bones delivery. (<--See what I did there? ;P)

The more books I write the more I realize that POV is one of the things I like to challenge myself with. Each book I've written has had some sort of POV challenge that I've had to try and solve. With my first book, THE BEAUTY'S BEAST, my POV challenge was the fact that the hero spends most of the book as a wolf! I really had to think about how that would feel, how he would communicate, how other people would interact with him, etc. My latest WIP, THE TIME POACHERS, is only my second time writing in first person present tense and yet I want to push myself further and use two POVs instead of the usual one for first person. Crazy, right? (Wish me luck!)

POV is one of the most important decisions a writer makes when they set down to write. It's the camera lens you use to focus the reader's attention, and choosing the wrong POV for your story can be a disaster. But even once you've chosen your POV you still have to make sure you exploit it to the fullest extent to develop your characters and serve your story.

Author bio:
Beth Matthews (a.k.a. E.D. Walker) is a Southern California girl, born and raised. She’s a total geek, a movie buff, and a mediocre swing dancer. She lives in sunny SoCal with her fiancĂ© and two of the neediest housecats on the planet. Veronica sez: yes, indeed they ARE the neediest cats I ever met.

Twitter:

Facebook:

Website:

Friday, January 16, 2015

Closing the Perspective Gap

You know the bit about when all you have is a hammer, everything is a nail? I was like that when it came to POV and perspective. All third person. All the time. Critique partners kept commenting on how distant my characters felt. Looking back, it's easy to see this was the price of suffering untreated, major depressive issues as a teen - everything happened at vast emotional remove, you know? And even though I'd finally been treated, the habit of emotional remove had stayed in place. Hardly conducive to a writing career. But I desperately wanted my stories to WORK. I just didn't have the emotional vocabulary to work out how to close the distance. It wasn't until a local, RWA meeting where the incomparable Stella Cameron looked me in the eye and explained that third person omniscient kept readers outside of my characters - something utterly incompatible with how romance works that the light bulb switched on in my head. I had a problem. I had to solve it come hell or high water.
Fortunately, about that same time, I went to the Rain Tree Conference in Victoria, BC. No. I didn't go just for the afternoon tea, no matter what anyone else tells you. At that conference that a pair of presenters recommended drafting in first person. It was a fast, easy exercise designed to get an author inside a character's head. Naturally, I'd previously claimed to hate first person. I may also have unwisely sworn never to write first person. But. Based on the feedback I'd been getting, I sucked it up and I attempted writing a draft in first person.

Suddenly, every last thing I'd ever spent waaaaaaay too much money learning at acting school came back. I knew how to turn myself into someone else. It said so on my degree. What I hadn't known how to do was turn myself into some distant he or she out there in the ether. Another Stella - Stella Adler once equated acting with playing what if. The great actors, she said, didn't make themselves into someone else, they asked 'what if I'd grown up with this background, were faced with this dilemma, this obstacle?' and they respond from within themselves.

Drafting in first person unlocked that for me - though I won't claim any sort of greatness - just a deeper level of understanding how to get readers into a character's emotional life. I hope.

However. I still have a first person bias. Only one piece (Emissary) ended up published in first person. All the rest were transcribed from first to third. The greatest compliment I ever had was when a critique partner complained when I brought a WIP that had been switched from first to third - she said, "Are you sure you want to make this switch? I miss the heroine." You see why I love my crit partners? Thing is, I'm still writing romance and third person gives me the most flexibility in getting the hero and the heroine some time on the page so readers can see from both points of view.

These days, I no longer have to draft in first person. If a story is particularly challenging, however, it's default. A kind of cheat I use to remind myself that it's about the feels, silly! And about a character's unique filter on whatever experience they're having. Drafting in first person seems to let me step around myself in some odd way and interact with a story with fewer hang ups. Dunno why. I'm sure there's some deep psychological and possibly disturbing reasoning there. I'm not sure I want to know. After all. The first to third seems to be working.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Perils of the Writer: Perspective and POV

I'm a pretty die-hard multiple-third-person-limited POV kind of guy.  This is because perspective and POV are tools in the writer's toolkit, and multiple-third-person-limited POVs are, for me, the vice grips of writing. Maximum control and maximum torque.
All right, that metaphor is a little strangled.
I'm not a fan of first-person, because I find it far too limiting.  Also, I come from a background of film and theatre, so I'm used to having some distance between the audience and the characters.  Plus, those are the kind of books I like.  I have very few favorites that are first-person.
I'm also not a fan of third-person omniscient, at least as far as my own writing goes.  I think it can be done very well-- Neil Gaiman is fantastic at it, for example-- and for it to work, I think it needs a distinct narrator's voice-- as if the narrator is a separate character.  I've dabbled with it, but it isn't a good fit for the stories I'm telling.
Here's what I really like about multiple-third-person: I get to jump around and be in the right person's head for any given scene.  I get to give the reader information that the main characters don't have.
I'm not really a big believer in any "rules" for who can be a POV character.  For me, the best POV character is whoever makes the scene most interesting.  Main character, secondary character, or random interloper who happens to be observing the action.
Of course, the real trick is making sure it all works.  Giving a character the POV is giving them power to define the narrative. You need to ensure that it won't disrupt your story. For example, if you're telling a murder mystery, jumping to the POV of a suspect will immediately confirm or exonerate them as the murderer.  You don't want to do that until it's the right time in the story to give that information.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Which POV Is Right...For Me?


Point(s) of View, the POV, the biggest decision a writer has to make before actually writing that first page.

For me, it's not a hard decision. Since I don't write instruction manuals or Choose Your Adventure books, I don't use Second Person (see James's article from yesterday for the definitions).  I write in Limited Third Person, some might say "deep POV." It's not the "I, Me" of First Person, but has the same constraints of the story being told from how the protagonist perceives the world.

Why Limited instead of Omniscient? High Fantasy often uses The All-Knowing Narrator, so I wouldn't be breaking the Contract of Expectations with readers if I chose Omniscient. The reason I choose Limited is because it is intimate. It more easily allows the reader to become the character. And, frankly, allows me, as the writer, to stay in my protagonist's headspace. To remain true to her motivations, actions, and reactions.

I have Under the Bed books written in First Person--one an Epic Fantasy, and more than one Urban Fantasy. At the time I wrote the books, First Person was a "must" for Urban Fantasy. There were whispers about that spreading into the Epic genre, so I gave it a go. (No wonder it's languishing in the dark with dust bunnies!) But trends changed and sub-sub-genres emerged. Industry pros relented in their fervent demands, and now the sub-sub-genres are a mix of First and Third POVs.

For now, my creativity is firmly seated in the High Fantasy sub-genre, so my stories will continue to be written in Third Person Limited.  What will likely change from one series to the next is the number of POVs in each book. Don't worry, dear readers, I'm a fervid believer in head-hopping being a literary sin.




Monday, January 12, 2015

A Matter of Perspective From James A Moore

First Person: The writer is, the Narrator: “I walked into the smoke-tainted air of Murphy’s Pub and looked around for Johnny. The bastard owed me money and I aimed to get paid.

Second Person: The writer, for some insane reason tells you what you feel and do. If you’re guessing I’m not fond of second person, you’re right. “You walk into the bar and nearly choke on the cigar fumes coming from the manager’s stogie. Murphy’s has a strict no smoking policy, but you know Murph never enforces on himself.  There’s a good chance Johnny is hanging around the place and doing his best not to pay you.”

Third Person: “Dan walked into Murphy’s Pub and felt his eye twitch in irritation at the vile stench of the owner’s cheap cigar. Murph looked hi way and grimaced apologetically. It didn’t take a genius to know Dan was on the prowl, and the manager was just glad the man wasn’t looking for him. In the far corner, his back to the door, the target of his rage sat talking with a few friends.

“Dan moved in the right direction and slipped the brass knuckles from his back pocket. Johnny owed him a lot of money and payment was due.”


That’s as basic a breakdown as I’m doing. Let me say first and foremost that I can just barely tolerate second person as a perspective and even when I am forgiving of that particular sin, my tolerance is limited. I think the nature of that beast is flawed. Most might disagree, but no one has convinced me that I’m wrong so far.

Now that we have that out of the way, let’s get on to the real issue here: Which is better, First Person or Third?

With my usual grace I’ll answer that with a vague response: It depends.

First person has some very good uses, especially for suspense and for intimacy. On the suspense front if you’re reading a first person narrative it’s easier to ratchet up the possibilities of a beat down. Let’s take a look at the nemesis-du-jour, Bryce Darby.

The following first person scene is just off the top of my head.


At seventeen years of age Bryce Darby stood six feet, four inches in height. He had bright red hair and pale skin adorned with a few constellations of freckles and a skin that was either burned and turning into a tan or tanned and growing more burnt by the second. His hands were both covered with an assortment of rings that were adorned with skulls, a lion’s head, and what looked like three crossed swords respectively.

I’d had plenty of chances to examine those rings in great detail, normally when he was holding me off the ground with one of his ham hock hands and waving the other fist under my nose. We had never been friends and I didn’t think that was going to change anytime soon.

Bryce was leaning against the brick exterior of the school, near the exit from the auto shop, and slowly murdering a toothpick in a continual grind between his pearly whites. His eyes regarded me with a sort of dead interest. There was no real expression in his baby blues at all until he spotted me. Then his brows pulled together over his broad nose and his mouth pulled down into a scowl.

I’d been planning a nice, leisurely walk home and maybe a few minutes of flirting with Katie Lowell. Just the thing to take the edge off a bad Monday. Now, with Bryce looking my way, I was remembering that just the week before my mouth had gone off half-cocked and said a few things about Darby’s heritage that he had not seen fit to forgive or forget.

“Need to talk to you, Corin.” The toothpick shredded between his incisors as he came my way.

I tried to think of anything I could possibly say that would end this conversation with me not in traction. Nothing was coming to mind. Darby took two more steps in my direction and I felt adrenaline kicking into my system like nitrous into a high performance engine. I hoped my legs were up to a hard run, because I knew my face wasn’t up to getting rearranged.


This scene, in third person, is from my novel, POSSESSIONS, in which our hero, Chris, decides to use the neighborhood bully as a means of escaping the bad guys.


“Look, Brittany doesn’t know a damned thing. I know, because I already asked her.” He looked around and saw still more people. Bryce Darby was leaning against the corner of his mother’s house, smoking a cigarette. The sun was bright and almost magnified as it cut through the thickening clouds. The way it ran across Darby’s face, he almost looked like a statue with bronzed hair. Darby lived with his father but still came back to the neighborhood from time to time to see his mother. He was wearing jeans and heavy hiking boots, both of which had seen better days a long time ago. He was also wearing a T-shirt with a picture of Yosemite Sam looking ornery and dangerous in a cartoonish sort of way. Darby and the cartoon gunslinger had a lot in common as far as Chris was concerned. They both had brutal faces, red hair and bad attitudes. The difference was that Bryce Darby was real and fully capable of breaking damned near anyone he saw in half. Bugs Bunny would have been rabbit stew inside of two minutes around the local terror of Chris’s early years. Seeing him made Chris want to scowl and then to smile as an idea finally came to his mind.
“Look, maybe if you described this key it would help?”
“I don’t suppose it could hurt.” Crawford shrugged and casually scanned the area. His eyes saw Darby and immediately ignored him. That was better than Chris could have hoped for. “It’s a little larger than a quarter, a gold coin with some fine silver filigree and the small gems in the center. It’s old, too. The original coin is actually a little uneven in shape.”

Chris heard the words but paid them little attention. His mind was already working on the Darby angle. He waited until they were even with his old classmate and then looked Bryce directly in the face. Bryce’s wide, square face turned to notice him, the dark eyes under a broad brow locked with Chris’s for a second, and he nodded almost imperceptibly. Damn, he’s in a good mood. Now I have to go and piss him off. On the best day, with maybe a dozen friends to help him, Chris still didn't like the idea of making the man angry. He wasn’t really that much bigger than Chris, but he had an almost unnatural capacity for violence and shoulders that made it nearly impossible for him to walk straight through a door. The thought that he might actually get bigger was enough to make most people gape in amazement. If even half the stories he’d heard were true—according to Jerry and a kid they both knew named Tom Murphy, Darby had once curb-stomped a grown man’s face for threatening to call the police on him. He didn't know if he believed it, but he’d never heard Bryce deny it, either—enraging Bryce Darby was probably a better way to get paralyzed than the pistol shoved against his side. It went against his nature to even get Darby’s attention. Actually deliberately making him angry? Well, that was almost a guarantee of bodily injuries.

Chris gave Darby the finger. What had been an almost pleasant look on his brutish face suddenly became a scowl. One corner of the red haired boy’s mouth lifted in an almost feral way, and he suddenly wasn’t leaning against the support post on his mother’s stoop any longer. He was standing straight and tall and looking twice as ugly as an IRS audit notice.  He lifted one leg and crushed out his cigarette against the worn heel of his boot. His eyes never left Chris’s.

Chris made another obscene gesture in his direction and smiled. 

Darby started walking his directing with a casual saunter that Chris knew meant nothing but pure trouble.

Both of those descriptions work well enough. They get the point across. But the first person can add a level of immediacy that third can’t as easily achieve. I tend to think of it as shorthand for the emotional occasions.

When should you use Third Person? When should you use first?

That’s easy. Use the one that works for the story. Listen I was 14,000 words into my latest novel and it just wasn't working for me. I mean, damn, it was not going well at all. It was going so badly, in fact, that I actually went back and rewrote/edited all 14,000 words from Third into First.

It was a damned big risk as far as I’m concerned, but you want to know something? It’s working now. The story that refused to flow for me is now working as well as anything I’ve done in a while.

In this case it’s the nature of the beast. I’m writing an apocalyptic novel. Things are going badly for planet Earth on a massive scale. In third person a lot of what I’d written comes across as statistics. This many bodies, over an area the size of that item. But when you add in the first person emotion, there is a palpable sense of dread offered in what would otherwise be a dry sequence. How can I tell the difference? The story is moving at a better pace and my first readers have told me very emphatically that first person works in this case.
And, because I am me and therefore likely certifiable, I’ll point to my one exception to the rule.

Sometimes the answer is BOTH works just fine.

In my novel SMILE NO MORE I tell the story in three separate segments for most of the book. Two of them are First Person. The third is in, no shock, Third Person, limited omniscience. That is to say, there is a limited perspective per third person scene, but it is definitely third person.

Scene One is told from the perspective of Cory Phelps, remembering the events that led up to his death. Scene Two is told from the perspective of Rufo the Clown—the corrupted spirit of Cecil Phelps—fifty years later as he seeks to find the family he left behind when he was murdered. Scene Three is from multiple third person perspectives and examines the consequences of Rufo’s modern day actions. It was a nightmare to write, but you know what? The story demanded it. The end result seems to have been worth it. Reviewers praised the intimacy of getting to know and sympathize with Rufo and also dreaded his very dark actions all the m ore because they were cheering him, often times knowing they shouldn’t have. That was what I wanted. That was what I got. It was worth the extra headaches of switching perspectives constantly.

It was what the story dictated.

I still maintain that Second Person was designed by Satan to annoy me. But that’s a matter of personal taste.

Until next time,

James A. Moore


Sunday, January 11, 2015

How Writing 1st Person POV Gave Me Boy Cooties

Yesterday, at #LERANM, my local RWA chapter, I gave a tutorial on using Twitter. We had a great time and the lovely and viviacious Katie Lane snapped this pic as I was talking. And gesticulating. LOL!

This week's topic in the bordello concerns perspective - as in first, second or third person point of view (POV) - which works best for us and why.

I started out writing in first person, because my natural form from the beginning was personal essays. Very much like my blog posts. I sometimes segue into second person, I notice. Particularly in blog posts where I start saying things like you don't really notice how essays and blog posts tend to be in first person because you expect non-fiction to be more so than fiction. <-See what I did there?

So, when I went to write my first novel - which eventually and after many revisions and iterations became Rogue's Pawn - I wrote that in first person. In fact, and I admit this with chagrin, I originally wrote that book in a memoir style. As if I, myself, had fallen through a gate to Faerie and wrote a memoir about my adventures. I thought I was SO BRILLIANT doing that, subverting the genre tropes and all. Thing is, I didn't write genre well enough to subvert the tropes - something I had to learn through painful trial, error and ego-bruising. Thinking about it now, it IS kind of a cool idea. Something I might have the craft to pull off at this point.

Hmm...

Anyhoo. I wrote in first person because it was what I knew and I had some skill at it. Readers tell me they like my first person perspectives when they don't like others. It's not easy to do because it's so restrictive. The reader can only know what the first person POV characters now. You can mix in more than one first person POV character (I don't like it) or mix in a third-person POV in with the first (like that even less), but the purest form - and really my very favorite - is one person, telling the story through their eyes. It works well for me because I feel like I can really delve into the person's character, along with their emotional and spiritual arc.

I started writing third person with erotic romance. Most fiction is really in third person. With my full length erotic romance novels, the Falling Under trilogy, I added in the hero's third-person POV too. I alternate POVs in those and that's fun, too, to build the story from two perspectives like that. I keep a very close POV, so that it's barely a step removed from first person. So close, in fact, that in writing the third book in the trilogy, I inadvertently slipped into first person - writing from the hero's POV! I couldn't figure out why I felt so... odd. Then I realized, a page or two later, that I was inside a man's head. A very strange place to be.

This may have marked a step up in writing craft for me however. I might try it again, if I can make sure to wash off the boy cooties afterward. ;-)

For the fantasy series I'm working on now - brand new, top sekrit stuff! - I'm writing in third person alternating POV, because my agent, fabulous Connor, asked me to. He  and Iwanted to target a particular market and I like the idea of selling books as well as the next Word Whore. At first I struggled, however. I *really* wanted to write in first person, particularly the heroine. But I applied discipline (GASP) and found my way through to her voice. Now I'm into it.

So, that doesn't really answer the question, I know. I like having all the tools. Each story is different and so are the various markets.

It would be interesting to know if you all like how I write one kind of POV over another - feel free to share!

Saturday, August 2, 2014

My Point of View

Well on closer examination of the topic sheet, actually the post is supposed to be about POV in writing, not so much my personal Point of View on the World. Darn. I was ready to pontificate on all kinds of things!

There was a spirited debate on this very subject last week on one of my author loops. People wanted to use first, second, third, alternating, stream of consciousness, omniscient.....pros/cons....it got heated at points in time as various authors tried to convert us all to their favorite style. Most of the contributors agreed that head hopping was a bad thing. As with everything else in the writing world, the consensus once the dust settled was that each person should do what works best for them and for their characters and story. Okay then.

Can't add much to that. Or to what the other Whores have said this past week. (My Muse is much less intense about dissecting the Elements of Craft than some people, can you tell?) I started out writing omniscient because that was the accepted style at the time. Author knows all, sees all, tells all. As K A Krantz said brilliantly, in this space, earlier in the week:
The tickle with Third Person is Omniscient versus Limited; Narrator versus Protagonist. Omniscient Third can see the Devil's Horde riding across the steppe toward our intrepid hero whoring in the village. Limited Third is the hero wholly focused on his bedbuddy.

That! right there!

Being a very controlling, all-knowing person, I LOVED being omniscient. It was a hard habit to break when I was gently informed by various Editors that nowadays what I probably wanted was more along the lines of Limited Third. And truthfully, I've had to give up some of my favorite classic authors who only write in Omniscient Third because now that I write so much, I find myself arguing with what's on the page. He doesn't know that! She can't read his mind! That's happening 300 miles away! Kinda ruins the flow of the story for me. Alas.

I usually tell a story from the alternating points of view of the two main characters, although Wreck of the Nebula Dream  is entirely from the hero's POV. One or the other character will have more of the page time for their POV, as the story demands.

The one thing I will never do is write an entire chapter or major scene in first person and then rewrite it in third limited to see which works better! Quel  horreur! (Which is probably very bad French, despite Google Translate's best efforts. My apologies. Always wanted to say that phrase though.) I haven't got the time or patience for that! Kudos to those who do but um, no. Not me.

So you're probably wondering what the intriguing science fiction romance box set is doing at the top of this post? OK, I'm excited to say my award winning book Escape From Zulaire  is included in Nebula Nights, along with ten other sci fi space operas and adventures. Available now at all major ebook sellers at a crazy low price of 99 cents!

Here's the blurb:
If you like your science fiction blazing with adventure and your space opera spiced with romance, this boxed set is for you. From first contact to battles for survival and love on war-torn planets, this collection from bestselling & award winning authors, including Cathryn Cade, Veronica Scott, PK Hrezo and more, will leave you sighing with satisfaction. 

Amazon     Barnes & Noble  All Romance


Friday, August 1, 2014

POV: Accepting Constraints

Point of view. It sounds so wonderfully straightforward, doesn't it? Pick a character. Tell the story from their point of view. Simple!

Except.

We then get sentences like "She turned purple with rage." What's wrong with it? It kinda violates POV. The last two words specifically. See, if I am the POV character, I can only tell you what I observe. I observed that she turned purple. 'With rage' is an assumption. IF that assumption is being made because it is within the confines of my character to do so, then okay - writer using a character's jumping to conclusion tic as a device within the story - maybe altering that character trait is part of the arc. Roger that.

It's just that 99% of the time, that's not what's happening. Certainly, it isn't what's happening when *I* do it. No. Most of the time, it's lazy story telling. Shorthand that let's me pretend there's emotion in my scene. Except that using my POV character to tell you someone turned purple with rage is just that - telling you. It's shallow POV. Showing is easier if I go deeper into my POV character's head, which makes it harder for me, as the author, to intrude. Then the same observation would look more like this:

Air hissed in between her clenched teeth. Her face flushed purple and she clenched her fists. I backed up a step.

Not a single feeling word in there - just a report of what a POV character saw, heard, and then how she reacted. From those things, you have a good grip on the underlying emotion. Given dialogue and context, you'd know whether my POV character had just delivered bad news, challenged this other gal to a duel, or what have you. You'll notice I automatically put this in first person. It's easier for me to get deep POV if I draft a story in first person. Most of my stories end up being 3rd person and I make that change in rewrites. Makes for interesting typos but drafting in first reminds me to stay honest about what my character can conceivably see, hear, smell, taste, think or feel.

POV is about accepting the constraints and limitations of only knowing what a single character can know. That's why so many stories trade off POV characters between scenes and/or chapters, so you can get more than one perspective on the central conflict. When I do that, generally sharing story telling between my heroine and hero, I have to decide who should have the story telling reins, when. I ask who among the characters has the most to lose. Sounds simple. Rarely is. It usually means me writing a scene or chapter both ways because I'm pathetic like that. Don't get me wrong. Usually, the POV I write in the first time (THIS character has the most to lose) is correct, but second guessing R I, thus the whole thing gets done from the other POV, too. Just in case *that* one is better. Leading my own observation that Point of View is certainly craft first, but once the mechanics are worked out, it becomes an art in your hands - one that dictates the voice and color of your stories.

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

POV and YOU

Point of View is as much a part of the experience of the book as those 3-D glasses are at a 3-D movie.

I can't imagine reading the Sword Dancer books and not having it in Tiger's POV. I wanted to know more about Del. I wanted to read what she was thinking, not just gauging her by what he saw her do. But that was part of the charm that kept me coming back, too. Yanno?

The Persephone Alcmedi series is all 1st person POV, her POV...until book 5. Then I started letting y'all into the heads of other characters. Specifically Johnny. I couldn't tell his tale without letting you in there a little bit. But it was 3rd person. When I'm able to get through the rest of the story arc and get to the last book, we'll even peek into Menessos's head. But I don't want to spend a lot of time there. It's a scary place.

The book I've been working on lately (and just wrapped...whew!) was all 3rd person. Maybe after a series with so much 1st person, I wanted something different. I'm sure that had some influence on it. But mostly, that is the only way the story could get told and, in the end, you must serve the story.

Can you think of a story in 1st person that might have been better in 3rd?

Can you think of a story in 3rd person that might have been better in 1st?

But what's really more important than 1st or 3rd is WHOSE POV you choose. Who has something to say that will get your reader engaged in the story? Who has the most interesting voice? Who has the most to gain? The most to lose? Who has already lost everything?

Think about this: Star Wars. (I know. You're sooo surprised, right?) Classic tale of the hero overcoming an enemy and saving lots of people in the process. Yay!

Then we get prequels. We see this adorable young Anakin...watch him grow up, love, and get manipulated by the worst dude in the galaxy, and remade, literally, a la Frankenstein, into the Bad Guy from Star Wars. But now we know too much. He's not the Bad Guy from Star Wars anymore. He's that poor kid that got mind-f**ked and, oh Obi Wan...why couldn't you see it and stop it and be the hero?

Now consider the current trend of going back and re-telling a familiar tale from the villain's POV.
Of course we all know the villain is the hero of his/her own story, but it gives you a different take on them, showing you that they are not the person you might have thought they were.

Apply that to your current WIP. See what changes, what deepens, what tugs at your heart.

You might be surprised.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Who Is Telling Your Story?

You've a plot. A loosely linked series of events. A motley cast of characters. A fantastical setting. You are ready to tackle the infamous Page One. Except...

You're not sure if you're going to write this in First Person, Present Tense; Third Person Omniscient, Past Tense; or Second Person, Present? 

Worse, you're not certain if your protagonist is really the best character to tell the story of his/her adventure.

What to do, what to do?

1) NO HEAD-HOPPING: Promise yourself (and me) that no matter how many Points of View your story has, you will only change POV at scene breaks or chapter breaks.  Repeat after me: I Will Not Head-Hop.
Say it again, aloud, "I Will Not Head-Hop."

2)  Pick a Tense. Which is more natural for you, "I stumble to the loo," or "I stumbled to the loo."

Past Tense: Don't be surprised if the latter example flowed more easily. A lot of novels are written in the past tense. Some attribute that to our legacy of oral histories. It probably has more to do with our daily communication. When you tell your friends about the flasher you cold-cocked in the park, you tell that story in the past tense because it happened last night ... in the past.  

Present Tense: There are stories that benefit from the author's extra effort of writing in present tense. For example, if you're writing a thriller or horror story and you need the audience to question whether or not the protagonist survives, present tense can help with that. Writing a Choose-Your-Adventure book? Then present tense works best since you are detailing "the now."

Immediacy is the key concept for deciding Present vs Past tense. If you need the reader to be right here, right now, right in this moment; then present tense is the way to go. 

CAUTION: readers often find that escaping into a story written in present tense is more difficult (likely because it is a less natural story telling voice).

3) Pick a Perspective:  First, Second, or Third Person.  I, You, or He. 

First Person: I snarfed the cookies.
Urban Fantasy relied heavily on First Person during its heyday, but like Present Tense, readers find it harder to fall into the story. First person also runs the risk of "I, I, I," -- which sounds like a kaiyaying dog. Oh hey, lookie there, I blogged about First Person Yipping before!

Second Person: You snarfed the cookies, dear reader, didn't you?
Unless you're writing epistolary novel (aka, Dear Diary) or this blog post, you can probably exclude Second Person. Yes, yes, there are exceptions.

Third Person: She snarfed the cookies.
Again, the most natural and therefore easiest of the perspectives to write and read. The tickle with Third Person is Omniscient versus Limited; Narrator versus Protagonist. Omniscient Third can see the Devil's Horde riding across the steppe toward our intrepid hero whoring in the village. Limited Third is the hero wholly focused on his bedbuddy.

4) Pick a Character (or Two or Three)
A story can be told from multiple characters' POV. As a guide, any characters I allow to tell the story have to be divergent parties who come together (either in love or in battle...or both) over the course of the story. In romance novels, there are typically two characters telling the story -- the two in the blossoming relationship. The two opposing parties who come together by the end of the story for the HEA. In Fantasy novels, these are characters who are after the same item/person/event but for different reasons with different paths and contrasting outcomes. The POV characters will naturally cross paths during the story; thus making it one cohesive story rather than three related short stories.

CAUTION: Too many POV characters prevent the reader from bonding with any of POV characters. So limit yourself.

The Final Test: If you can't decide which character, which tense, or which perspective here's a simple (albeit time-consuming) sure-fire test:  Write Chapter One. Write it again from a different character's POV, different tense, and different perspective. Re-write as many times as you need to make the right decisions for the story you want to tell.

Dear readers, what tips do you have for deciding Tense, Perspective, and Character?

Sunday, July 27, 2014

Savoring the Outside Point of View


Last night my most excellent friend, critique partner and Word-Whore alum, Carolyn Crane, won the Romance Writers of America (RWA) RITA award for her romantic suspense, Off the Edge. Even more exciting, she's the first author to win a RITA with a self-published book.

We knew she was one of the finalists, but it wasn't until the awards ceremony that we found out.

Carolyn has been my roommate at the conference all week, which is a treat for us. We live on different sides of the country and mostly communicate via email and instant messenger, sprinkled in with the occasional phone call. We often bemoan that we can't meet for a drink or lunch, so our five-day grown-up slumber party is an opportunity to saturate ourselves in writer talk and to savor each other's company.

The RITA finalists get to bring a guest or two to share their VIP table at the RITA awards, so I was Carolyn's date last night. I don't think it really hit either of us, the reality of the building tension, until a few hours before. We'd been running around all week, going to and from panels, speeches, meetings, lunches and parties. But we made sure to meet for dinner, eating early at 5:30, so we'd have time to get into our fancy dresses.

She was keyed up and so was I. Even though I kept reassuring her with the very true observation, that finaling for the RITA is really the big bump - in buzz and sales - I started to feel nervous. Now, a date's job at this kind of thing is to help maintain the calm, to buffer the anxiety, so I kept up a good face. Still, I really wanted this for her and the imminent possibility of great celebration or the bruise of disappointment loomed. I had my consolation words planned, knowing well how it can sting, even when you KNOW it's still amazing to get that close.

When her category came up, I rubbed a hand over her back, as much to soothe myself as her.

When they called her name, I burst into tears. I rarely have experienced the happy cry, but I did last night.

When she came back to the table, carrying her heavy golden statue, she sat and said, "Did I remember to thank you in my speech?" and I said, "I don't know - I was crying!"

One of those stories we'll tell forever.

This week's theme is: Choosing point-of-view (POV): How Do You Know Which One Is Right For Your Story?

In many ways, this is Carolyn's story. But it's also mine. I've walked this road with her from the very first glimmer of the concept for this series. Last night felt as much my joy as hers. Conventional wisdom says we should choose POV according to which character has the greatest emotional stake in a scene. Which means, if I were writing the book, I'd want to tell you this story from Carolyn's POV.

In real life, however, it's necessarily my POV. I can give a perspective that she can't. One infused with the pure elation of celebrating someone else's victory.

A sweet place to be.