The fine art of editing.
This week’s subject is near and dear to my heart. Well, no,
not really, but it’s one I deal with regularly. The idea here is to go over
what each of us does with a manuscript before sending it out into the cold,
harsh publishing world. Well, you do what you can to prepare a manuscript,
don’t you? You warn them, tell them to stay away from strangers, not to sell
themselves too short, not to expect the world to give them everything they
deserve, because sometimes, most times, really, the world is cruel.
All kidding aside, there are several things that I feel must
be done and that depends, in large part, on the individual project. Because for
me at least they are all different. Sometimes I collaborate with other writers,
and that means I have to work out a plan of attack with my partner in crime. I
recently finished my second novel with co-author Charles R. Rutledge, and to be
honest the only way I can describe our collaborative process is to compare it
to juggling knives with someone you feel you can trust. Both of us are
prolific, and we seem to work in very similar fashion. The books we’re writing
together have short, fast chapters, and we will often exchange chapters on a
daily basis. The first novel we worked on took us all of eight weeks to write
on the first draft and the second novel took just at six weeks. Each book is a
bit beyond 80,000 words.
See? Fast.
And the way we’ve worked it so far is he sends me a chapter,
I do a line edit on what he wrote, cleaning up and obvious typographical
errors, and then I write the next chapter and send it back. And then he does
the exact same in return. And we continue the process, with occasional phone
calls, emails or even lunches, until the novel is done. We normally meet once a
week anyway, as part of a larger group, and we often discuss upcoming projects
then as well. But by and large, we’re editing each other as we go; rereading
what has already been written and then sending back at high speed. It’s fun,
it’s frantic, and it’s decidedly enough to keep us on our toes. We are planning
several collaborations.
That’s the first draft, of course. After that the real
challenge comes around. We wait. We might discuss a few scenes, but mostly we
wait for at least a month or two and then we edit the entire affair again. Why
wait? Because you need to look at a manuscript with fresh eyes. The thing about
writing something is you KNOW what you meant to say. And sometimes, annoyingly,
your eyes will look at a mistake and ignore it because the words you meant to
type are still too fresh in your brain and much like a computer, you might
every well autocorrect the words on a mental level. That’s the way it’s always
been for me, and so after a book is finished, I wait.
Now, that doesn’t mean not doing anything. It means not
doing anything with the manuscript. In the meantime there are plotting
sessions, outlines to contemplate, proposals to send out and negotiations to
consider. All of that other stuff that is part of being a professional writer
type. As a rule, with few exceptions, I finish a manuscript before I edit. I
then go about the business part of the equation, selling, working out the synopsis, outlines, and
packaging the entire affair for sales. Yes, agents are supposed to do that too,
but from time to time (okay, most of my career) I’ve been un-agented and that
means handling the business aspects yourself.
Then it’s back to the editing. Each chapter of the
collaborations gets edited by Charles and then by me and then we compare notes
and make a few final adjustments.
Egos are always involved, by the way. And should be set
aside whenever possible. Currently it’s my turn to do a first serious edit of
our latest manuscript, and Charles pointed out a few spots where I might want
to look at correcting potential plot holes. Let me clarify for you. He looked
at the parts I wrote, noticed weaknesses, and suggested that I look them over
and consider a change or two. He did not make the change himself. I have done
the same for him. It’s one thing to correct a typo and another thing to rewrite
each other’s work. The novel is collaborative, yes, but when it comes to
characterization and motivation, we never assume to know exactly what the other
is thinking. When I am done with the final tweaks, we’ll work on selling this
one.
So, for the collaborative works, I establish rules with my
co-author and then we write and edit as we go.
And you know what? I do almost the same thing on the solo
work. Write it first, then edit it after waiting for a couple of months. Want
to know something? The biggest difference is the editing is harder when you don’t
have someone else’s words to play with. It’s that autocorrect I was speaking about
before. Sometimes the mind plays tricks, but seldom when I’m reading someone
else’s words.
I don’t outline. I don’t do details synopsis until the book
is done. I don’t edit much until then, either. But when the first draft is
finished, there are at least three edits left to do.
Mind you, I’ll contend that there is no right or wrong in
this process. You need to do it the way that works best for you. Well, okay,
with one proviso: you absolutely must edit. At least if you would like to sell
the work you are producing somewhere along the way.
James A. Moore
The collab thing is actually really interesting to me. The only times I've tried collabing with an actual story, I wrote some of the characters and the other writer wrote the others - so there was a lot more back and forth. (Probably one of the reasons it crashed and burned so hard, too.)
ReplyDeleteThe webcomic collab is different tho - since that's pretty much all me on the writing side. I just have to make sure it's detailed enough for the artist to interpret. :)
I love comic scripts. One of these days I might even get a chance to work on some of them for pay again.
ReplyDeleteThe catch with collaborations is to lay out the rules in advance, I think. My first rule: The Ego can wait outside while the grown-ups talk. No word I write is pure magic, and that goes for my collaborator, too.